UAPA case against NewsClick: In the case filed by Delhi Police under the terms of the UAPA, the Delhi High Court has reserved its decision regarding the bail request of Amit Chakravarty, the HR director of the news portal NewsClick. The Court stated that Chakravarty had changed to an approver in this matter while reserving the order.
Tag: Delhi High Court
Delhi HC directs AAP govt to pay Rs 1 crore to COVID-stricken constable’s family
The Delhi High Court has ordered the AAP government to provide the family of police constable Amit Kumar, who passed away in 2020 after contracting COVID-19 while on duty, Rs 1 lakh in ex-gratia compensation.
As per the directive from the government, Justice Prathiba M. Singh noted that the compensation amount ought to be disbursed in a span of four weeks.
Delhi HC Reserves Decision on Interim Bail of Businessman Amit Arora in Excise Policy Case
Delhi Excise Policy Case: Delhi High Court reserved its decision on the interim bail of businessman Amit Arora in the Delhi Excise Policy case. He had sought interim bail on the grounds of his daughter’s illness.
Plea in Delhi HC to ban the use of INDIA alliance; notices issued to Centre, EC, oppn parties
A PIL was submitted to the Delhi High Court asking for an order prohibiting the use of the acronym Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance (I.N.D.I.A.) by a number of political parties.
The Indian National Development Inclusive Alliance, an opposition front announced by the leaders of 26 parties to challenge the BJP in the upcoming elections, is abbreviated as “I.N.D.I.A”.
A division bench made up of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Sanjiv Narula heard the plea today. The central government, the Election Commission, and the opposition parties have all received notices from the court.
Through advocate, Vaibhav Singh, petitioner Girish Upadhyay said that various political parties are adopting our national flag as their symbol of allegiance, which is another clever ruse to win the support and votes of uninformed voters. step. This spark has the potential to ignite political animosity, which will ultimately ignite political bloodshed.
The petition said that political parties are abbreviating “I.N.D.I.A.” with the intention of harming our magnificent country, which will affect India’s reputation both within our own country and on numerous international platforms.
SC seeks to Delhi Police on bail plea of Umar Khalid, accused of conspiracy in Delhi riots, seeks reply in 6 weeks
Regarding Umar Khalid’s request for bail after being charged with conspiracy in the Delhi riots, the Supreme Court has sent a notice to the Delhi Police. The Delhi Police have six weeks to respond to the apex court’s request.
The Delhi High Court had already rejected Khalid’s request for bail, describing the accusations against him as severe.
Umar Khalid, a graduate of JNU, and several other people have been charged with “masterminding” the riots in February 2020 under the Indian Penal Code and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA).
During demonstrations against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) and the National Register of Citizens (NRC), there was violence in Delhi. The riots resulted in 53 fatalities and more than 700 injuries.
BharatPe files case against Ashneer Grover’s wife under section 420
Ashneer Grover, a former MD, and co-founder of BharatPe, is now facing more challenges. Madhuri Jain, Ashneer Grover’s wife and the former Head of Controls of BharatPe, has been charged under section 420 of the IPC. The Delhi High Court will conduct the hearing on the subject.
Related Post – Healthy Habits: Trouble with stomach problems! Make these four habits your daily routine and get benefits
Ashneer Grover and his wife were shown the exit by BharatPe in the same year due to allegations of financial misconduct. A criminal complaint for nearly Rs 80 crore in fraud has been filed by BharatPe.
The alleged misappropriation of funds was alleged against Ashneer Grover and Madhuri Jain in February. Based on the conclusions of the preliminary assessment by Alvarez and Marsal, he was excluded.
Alvarez and Marsal were then joined by PwC to look into the discrepancies. Alvarez & Marsal and PwC both received information from the corporation about its own investigation into financial issues.