Karnataka High Court Archives

CM Siddaramaiah in trouble, court imposes fine on many ministers including Karnataka CM

Karnataka: The chief minister Siddaramaiah, state cabinet ministers MB Patil and Ramalinga Reddy, and Congress politician Randeep Singh Surjewala were all fined Rs 10,000 by the Karnataka High Court and were ordered to appear in person before the Court of People’s Representatives.

Karnataka High Court imposed a fine of Rs 10,000 on CM Siddaramaiah, state cabinet ministers MB Patil, Ramalinga Reddy and Congress leader Randeep Singh Surjewala and asked them to appear physically before the people's representatives' court.

CM Siddaramaiah has been asked to…
— ANI (@ANI) February 6, 2024

The schedule for CM Siddaramaiah’s appearance is March 6; Transport Minister Ramalinga Reddy’s appearance is March 7; Congress Karnataka in-charge, RS Surjewala, appears on March 11; and heavy industries minister, MB Patil, appears on March 15.

In April 2022, KS Eshwarappa’s arrest was demanded by Congress leaders, including the current Chief Minister, over alleged involvement in the death case of contractor Santosh Patil.

Hijab Row: Karnataka High Court dismissed the petition of the girl students, saying – Hijab is not necessary in Islam

The Karnataka High Court, which has just completed hearings in the Hijab Case, dismissed all the petitions filed against the ban on hijab. The High Court ruled that hijab-wearing is not mandatory in Islam. High courts during this time have ruled that students cannot refuse to wear school uniforms. In addition, the High Court has made clear that there is no basis for invalidating the government order of 5 February. Following the decision by the High Court, it is believed that after analyzing the decision, the girl students may appeal to the Supreme Court.

BJP leader Prahlad Joshi and Union Minister Anugrah Singh have both welcomed the high court’s decision in the Hijab controversy. According to him, he welcomed the court’s decision. Maintaining peace and order is everyone’s responsibility. Studying is the primary responsibility of a student. ‘Leave all these matters aside and study and be united.’

The girls’ petition was heard by the entire Udupi High Court bench of Chief Justice Rituraj Awasthi, Justice Krishna S Dixit, and Justice JM Kazi. All of these girls urged the High Court to allow them to wear hijab along with school uniforms in class. The man had said that it was part of his religious faith.

Since the High Court’s decision on Tuesday, section 144 has been implemented in many districts of the state in order to ensure security. Section 144 is also applicable in Bengaluru. Furthermore, security has been stepped up outside the residence of Karnataka High Court Chief Justice Rituraj Awasthi.

Students at a pre-university college in Udupi, demanding to be allowed to wear the hijab in class, sparked controversy when some Hindu students came to class in saffron shawls. The government stuck to its uniform policy as the issue spread throughout the state.

Effect of Hijab controversy, DS College in Aligarh prohibits admission of students without the prescribed uniform

Students without the prescribed uniform are not permitted to enter Dharma Samaj (DS) College in Aligarh city, Uttar Pradesh, on Thursday. All students should wear the prescribed uniform to the college, according to the notice. If they do not wear the prescribed uniform, then the college administration is required to deny them admission. This command should be strictly followed.

Related Post – How to Make Nail Polish Dry Faster

Dr. Rajkumar Verma points out that students with a covered face will not be allowed into the college. The college will not allow students with covered faces to enter. Similarly, wearing saffron stoles or hijabs is not allowed on the college’s premises. A large part of the hijab controversy originated in Karnataka because Muslim schoolgirls had to remove their headscarves in order to enter educational institutions.

Students from the Udupi district in Karnataka raised their voices against it. Later, these girls appeared in High Court to plead their case. Since then, this case has been escalating. A temporary ban has been imposed by the Karnataka High Court on wearing religious symbols to school. The Hijab case is currently before the court.

In Islam, only 5 things are required; Hijab is not one of them: State Governor of Kerala

Arif Mohammad Khan, the governor of Kerala, says the discussion over a hijab is not a controversy, but a plot to undermine Muslim women. Religion and education do not conflict, he said. In Islam, religion is a means for men to attain enlightenment. Moreover, he mentioned that the hijab is also a necessary tradition in Islam, which is why Article 25 should be protected.

In reference to the Supreme Court judgment, the Governor, from Uttar Pradesh, said that any aspect that would be protected under Article 25 would have to be necessary, intrinsic, and non-violent. It must become integral to practice.

This Hijab controversy started in Udupi, Karnataka last month when students protested the ban. In protest against this, other students began wearing saffron scarves to college. The conflict quickly spread across the state. Several demonstrations and harassment were held against Muslim girls, forcing the state to curtail education temporarily and call for peace from the court.

Several students are contesting the ban on wearing the hijab before the Karnataka High Court under the principle of religious freedom.

Islam’s religious books describe in detail what is required, according to Governor Khan. There are five essential features of these, which are called Arkan-e-Islam. Those who have the means should affirm their faith through Kalima, pray at regular intervals, fast during Ramadan, give to charitable causes, and make the Hajj if they can afford it. They said no additions or deletions were allowed.

In order to determine whether this (Hijab) is a part of religious freedom, the Supreme Court has ruled that only those elements that are essential to the practice of the faith are protected under Article 25. The hijab is certainly not among them.

He said it is the result of complete ignorance that the hijab is banned in educational institutions, affecting the education of girls and women. In pointing out that the first word in the Qur’an is “read”, he said that human beings should not just rely on reading the name of God. In quoting relevant passages, he said that man was supposed to think about animals, stars, and space, and if needed, go to China to search for knowledge. The Qur’an contains over 700 words expressing knowledge, thinking, and meditation. Religion is concerned with seeking knowledge.

Related Post – 3 Ways to Improve Your Website Traffic with Google Adwords

As far as the hijab controversy in Karnataka that has raged for over a month is concerned, it is part of a “sinister conspiracy” to push back Muslim women. After the triple talaq ban, he says, Muslim women feel liberated. It gives them a sense of independence. She is getting an education. She is making a huge career and now there is a conspiracy.

( Source Link )