Supreme Court reprimands Delhi government for not providing funds for RRTS project

In response to the Delhi government‘s failure to contribute its share of funds to the rapid rail project, the Supreme Court is angry. According to the court, you have a Rs 1100 crore three-year advertising budget, but there isn’t any money left over for significant projects.

Delhi government faces warning from Supreme Court for not funding RRTS project. Why did the government of Delhi disobey the court’s ruling? The Delhi government’s advertising budget would be stopped by us. “We’ll attach it and bring it here,” declared the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court ordered the project to get funds from the Delhi government for advertising, but it postponed the decision for a week. If the funds were not transferred, the ruling would take effect.

Supreme Court notice to Center on Kerala government’s petition against the Governor

Kerala: Regarding the Kerala Governor‘s refusal to approve the Assembly’s enacted measures, the Supreme Court has sent notices to the Governor’s office and the Center.

For the upcoming hearing, the bench of CJI DY Chandrachud has requested that the Attorney General and the Solicitor General appear in person with the relevant documentation. The adjourned hearing is scheduled for December 1.

The Kerala administration accused Governor Arif Mohammed Khan of sitting on key government laws and doing nothing about the bills that the Assembly had passed.

In its petition, the State of Kerala claimed that the Governor’s actions in prolonging the status of the Bills beyond a reasonable doubt constituted clear arbitrary behavior and violated Article 14 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to equality.

Congress leader Randeep Surjewala gets big relief from Supreme Court

The Supreme Court provided Congressman Randeep Surjewala with significant relief. In the 23-year-old case of violent protests in the court and Divisional Commissioner’s office premises in Varanasi, the Supreme Court has granted Congress national spokesperson Randeep Surjewala five weeks of protection.

The Supreme Court granted Surjewala four weeks to file an application with the Varanasi court to request the revocation of the non-bailable warrant (NBW) and directed that the NBW issued against him not be executed for five weeks.

Supreme Court rejects Sisodia’s bail plea, orders trial to conclude in 6-8 months

Manish Sisodia, the former deputy chief minister of Delhi, is accused of corruption and money laundering in connection with the excise policy scam. The Supreme Court denied his bail request.

Judges Sanjiv Khanna and SNV Bhatti’s bench issued the decision refusing Sisodia bail. The apex court has ordered that Sisodia’s trial be concluded between six and eight months.

Supreme Court notice to Election Commission and government, asked to file their reply in four weeks

Prior to the assembly elections in Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan, the Election Commission of India, the Central Government, and the state governments have all received notices from the Supreme Court.

Let us inform you that there is a PIL that mentions the use of taxpayer funds by governments to entice voters ahead of elections.

The Central Government, Madhya Pradesh Government, Rajasthan Government, and the Election Commission of India have all received notices from the Supreme Court in response to a PIL about the alleged distribution of cash and other freebies at the expense of taxpayers. Additionally, the Supreme Court has given the Center, the States, and the Election Panel four weeks to submit their responses.

SC notice to Udhayanidhi Stalin on controversial statement on Sanatan Dharma

According to news agency ANI, Udhayanidhi Stalin, a minister in the Tamil Nadu government, received a notice from the Supreme Court on Friday for making a divisive comment on Sanatan Dharma.

This notification was released by the Supreme Court in response to a petition challenging Udhayanidhi and A Raja’s criticism of Sanatan Dharma. According to the court, it will hear this case and other ongoing petitions against hate speech.

In a petition, a lawyer from Chennai requests that Tamil Nadu’s anti-Sanatan Dharma campaigns be ruled unlawful.

Udhayanidhi Stalin had equated dengue fever and malaria to Sanatan Dharma. He had stated that some things couldn’t be contested and needed to be done away with. In the same way that we must also work to eradicate dengue and malaria, we cannot simply resist these diseases. Similar to this, Sanatan Dharma needs to be eliminated in addition to being fought.

Article 35A Denied Jammu and Kashmir Non-Residents Their Key Rights: Supreme Court’s strong comment

Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud made a significant statement at the Article 370 hearing in front of the Supreme Court. During the hearing, he said that Article 35-A had stripped citizens of numerous essential rights. Citizens’ rights to work, equal opportunity, and property ownership in Jammu and Kashmir have been taken away.

The CJI made this remark during the 11th day of the hearing on the petitions contesting the repeal of Article 370.

The CJI said that all citizens should have equal access to employment opportunities and appointments to positions under the state, as well as the ability to purchase real estate and work for the state government. The citizens are robbed of all this by this essay. This is also the case because these were the residents’ only rights and were not included in those of non-residents. He asserted that the Government of India is a single entity as defined by the Indian Constitution. The Government of India is a perpetual entity.

In response to the petitioner’s arguments, the Solicitor General stated that since Article 35A was repealed, investment and tourism have begun in Jammu and Kashmir due to the establishment of a police system close to the city center. Approximately 16 lakh tourists have visited Jammu and Kashmir since the system was changed. In the region, new hotels have opened. A significant number of people are employed.

Lalu Prasad’s difficulties in the fodder scam case increased, hearing on the petition for cancellation of bail on 25th

The fodder scam issue seems to be giving Lalu Prasad Yadav more trouble. On August 25, a hearing will be conducted to discuss the plea to revoke Lalu Prasad Yadav’s bail.

Related Post – Top 10 Fashion Bloggers in Kerala who rocked the Fashion World with their Trend

The CBI petitioned the Supreme Court to cancel Lalu Yadav’s bail and requested an early hearing. A hearing has been scheduled by the Supreme Court. The case will now be heard on August 25.

On another CBI petition, the Supreme Court had given notice on March 27. Lalu Prasad Yadav has received a notice from the Supreme Court. The original petitions and the petition from the CBI were combined by the Supreme Court. The CBI wants that Lalu Yadav’s bail in the Doranda Treasury case to be revoked. The Supreme Court has heard the CBI’s appeal of the Jharkhand High Court’s bail decision.

In the Jharkhand case involving the Doranda Treasury, Lalu was granted bail and released from custody. In the Doranda Treasury-related fodder scandal, Lalu Prasad Yadav received a five-year imprisonment along with a Rupees 60 lakh fine. The primary fodder scam conspirator has been identified as Lalu Yadav. There will now be a single bench hearing all cases simultaneously.

Supreme Court stays removal of encroachment near Krishna Janmabhoomi in Mathura for 10 days, notice issued

The demolition campaign being carried out by the railway authorities to clear encroachments close to Krishna Janmabhoomi in Mathura has been put on hold by the Supreme Court for ten days.

According to the petitioner, people have lived on the land where the railway is removing the encroachment for more than 100 years. This led to a demand for the action to be stopped.

According to the petitioner, there had been habitation on the property where the railroad was eliminating the encroachment for more than a century. On the basis of this, a request to cease the action was made.

The petitioner informed the court that the Railways had already cleared up many encroachments. There are currently 70–80 remaining homes; therefore, destruction should be halted. Immediately after the apex court stayed the action, the Railways were asked to respond. However, no one was present on behalf of the Railways in the Supreme Court during the hearing.

Rahul Gandhi reaches Parliament after restoration of membership, welcomed by INDIA coalition MPs

Rahul Gandhi returned to Parliament on Monday, following the restoration of his parliamentary membership. Rahul Gandhi arrived in Parliament after 137 days and was greeted by INDIA alliance MPs.

Previously, Rahul Gandhi altered his Twitter bio. He has written Member of Parliament in this. Rahul Gandhi is the Member of Parliament for Wayanad in Kerala.

On Friday, the Supreme Court overturned Rahul Gandhi’s two-year sentence and conviction in the Modi surname defamation case. Rahul Gandhi’s Parliament membership was reinstated as a result of a notification issued by the Lok Sabha Secretariat on Monday.

Exit mobile version