Tag: Supreme Court

Supreme Court reprimanded Aam Aadmi Party, said – directed to give Rs 415 crore for RRTS

The Delhi government was ordered by the Supreme Court on Monday to pay Rs 415 crore for the ‘Regional Rapid Transport System’ (RRTS) within two months.

If the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP)-led government could spend Rs 1,000 crore on advertisements in the previous three years, obviously infrastructure projects could be funded, a bench of Justices SK Kaul and Sudhanshu Dhulia noted.

The Delhi government had previously stated that it was unable to provide funding for the RRTS initiative, and as a result, the Supreme Court ordered it to document the amount of money it had spent on advertising over the previous three years.

In the Gyanvapi case, the Supreme Court stayed the survey of ASI till July 26

On Monday, the process of conducting a scientific inspection of the remaining locations—aside from the sealed warehouse situated on Varanasi’s Gyanvapi premises—began. While the Muslim side abstained, the Hindu parties to the case, including the ASI team, arrived at the location. The Supreme Court temporarily stopped the digging in response to a plea from the Muslim side.

The ASI survey in the Gyanvapi case has been put on hold by the Supreme Court until July 26. At the request of the Muslim side, the Supreme Court issued a stay of this. The Muslim side had petitioned the Supreme Court to stop this survey, and as a result, the court ordered that the survey activities cease until 5 PM on July 26.

According to the Supreme Court, the Muslim side may appeal the case to the High Court. A high alert has been issued by the administration for the city.

Modi Surname Case: Supreme Court allows Rahul Gandhi’s appeal for urgent hearing in defamation case

Rahul Gandhi‘s request for an urgent hearing in the defamation case was allowed by the Supreme Court. Rahul Gandhi, the head of the Congress, has asked the Supreme Court to hear his appeal on July 21 in an effort to overturn the Gujarat High Court’s decision to uphold his conviction in a criminal defamation case. Rahul Gandhi was given a two-year prison term by a Surat court for his statement about the “Modi surname.”

Rahul Gandhi’s senior attorney, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, requested an immediate hearing on his behalf. Rahul Gandhi was given a 2-year term in the defamation case by the sessions court in Surat on March 23, 2023. Rahul’s MP had gone after this decision.

Mamata government got a big blow from the Supreme Court! HC order on deployment of central forces upheld

In the West Bengal Panchayat election violence case, the Supreme Court dealt the Mamta government and the State Election Commission a serious blow. A petition opposing the Calcutta High Court‘s decision on the use of centralized troops in the West Bengal Panchayat elections was dismissed by the Supreme Court.

While rejecting the State Election Commission’s appeal, the Supreme Court refused to overturn the High Court’s decision. An appeal against the Calcutta High Court‘s order to deploy central security personnel in each district within 48 hours has been filed with the Supreme Court.

Bengal Panchayat Election: HC orders deployment of central security forces in every district, SC will hear this petition tomorrow

The petition filed by the Mamata government and the State Election Commission in the West Bengal Panchayat elections violence case will be heard by the Supreme Court tomorrow. The deployment of central security troops in each district within 48 hours had been mandated by the Calcutta High Court. Both have appealed this to the Supreme Court.

Let us inform you that Mamata Banerjee, the chief of the TMC and the chief minister of Bengal, filed a review case contesting the judgment of the Calcutta High Court. Mamta has asked the High Court to have its judgment reexamined. Prior to the panchayat elections, the Calcutta High Court ordered the deployment of central forces throughout the entire state.

During the Panchayat elections in Bengal, there is a lot of violence. To date, dozens of people have been hurt while other people have died in various events. The Calcutta High Court had issued this directive in light of this.

SC seeks to Delhi Police on bail plea of Umar Khalid, accused of conspiracy in Delhi riots, seeks reply in 6 weeks

Regarding Umar Khalid’s request for bail after being charged with conspiracy in the Delhi riots, the Supreme Court has sent a notice to the Delhi Police. The Delhi Police have six weeks to respond to the apex court’s request.

The Delhi High Court had already rejected Khalid’s request for bail, describing the accusations against him as severe.

Umar Khalid, a graduate of JNU, and several other people have been charged with “masterminding” the riots in February 2020 under the Indian Penal Code and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA).

During demonstrations against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) and the National Register of Citizens (NRC), there was violence in Delhi. The riots resulted in 53 fatalities and more than 700 injuries.

Jallikattu will not be banned in Tamil Nadu, Supreme Court’s decision

Tamil Nadu will not ban Jallikattu. The bull-taming sport of Jallikattu has been maintained by the Supreme Court on the grounds that it is a part of Tamil Nadu’s cultural heritage.

All petitions contesting the legality of state legislation permitting the bull-taming sport Jallikattu and bullock cart racing have been rejected by the Supreme Court.

According to the Supreme Court, Tamil Nadu’s law is legitimate and error-free. The legislature is the best entity to decide on a state’s cultural heritage, according to the court, and the judiciary cannot make that decision.

Supreme Court to hear Manipur violence today, Govt ready to hold talks with groups

After a week of intense violence, things are slowly getting back to normal in Manipur. On Monday, 11 districts in Manipur had their full curfew partially lifted.

Meiteis and tribals engaged in violent battles in the state over the demand to be classified as a Scheduled Tribe, which led to a worsening of the situation.

The Supreme Court has now taken up the case, and the hearing will take place today, or Monday. According to sources, Union Minister G Kishan Reddy stated that the federal government is willing to engage in discussions with the groups in Manipur to address their concerns in light of the violence in the state.

YouTuber Manish Kashyap got a big blow from the Supreme Court, refused to hear the petition filed

Manish Kashyap of West Champaran, Bihar, a popular YouTuber, has received a severe hit from the Supreme Court. On Monday, the Supreme Court’s bench presided over by CJI DY Chandrachud declined to hear a plea challenging YouTuber Manish Kashyap’s release on bail and the imposition of NSA on him.

In Tamil Nadu and Bihar, numerous cases have been filed against Manish Kashyap. In addition to this, NSA has been imposed on him. Manish Kashyap petitioned the Supreme Court to stop this.

Manish Kashyap may proceed to the High Court for this, the Supreme Court ruled. In addition, the Supreme Court denied the request to group all the cases together.

Supreme Court’s big decision on divorce, divorce is possible without waiting for 6 months

An important decision regarding the divorce of the couple has been handed down by the constitution bench of five judges of the Supreme Court. In accordance with Article 142, the Supreme Court has the power to dissolve a marriage on the grounds of “irretrievable breakdown of marriage”.

The Supreme Court declared on Monday that it is within its rights to dissolve a marriage on the grounds of an insurmountable rift between the spouses under Article 142 of the Constitution.

The SC made it plain that sending the parties to the Family Court, where they could have to wait for six to 18 months, is not necessary.

Exit mobile version