Supreme Court Archives - Page 6 of 7

Supreme Court asks Media One channel to issue renewal license within four weeks

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court granted Media One’s request to appeal the Kerala High Court decision upholding the decision of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting to revoke the license of the news network.

The Ministry of Information and Broadcasting was ordered by the Supreme Court to grant the Media One channel a renewal license within four weeks. The top court let the renewal go through until a temporary order.

The court made a significant statement about press freedom during this time. claimed that a free press is essential to society’s functioning.

Supreme Court allows Media One's plea challenging the Kerala High Court order which upheld the order of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting to revoke the license of the news channel.

SC says an independent press is important for
functioning of society.
— ANI (@ANI) April 5, 2023

A plea challenging Rajasthan’s internet shutdowns during exam periods has been accepted by the Supreme Court

On Wednesday, the Supreme Court decided to take up a petition challenging Rajasthan’s decision to suspend internet access from February 25 through February 28 in order to hold exams. In Rajasthan, the internet was shut off for three days to stop exam cheating.

The plea alleged that the Internet outage had an impact on judicial activity.

#SupremeCourt agreed to examine a plea questioning the imposition of three-day Internet shutdown in #Rajasthan to prevent cheating in competitive exams.

The plea claimed the Internet shutdown affected judicial work. pic.twitter.com/PZwoVnNZEM
— IANS (@ians_india) March 1, 2023

Supreme Court gave great relief to Congress leader Pawan Khera; Order to grant interim bail

The Supreme Court granted Congress leader Pawan Khera a huge relief soon after he was detained by the Assam Police. The Supreme Court granted Pawan Khera’s request for temporary bail. Assam Police and UP Police have also received notice from the court on the petition to combine the FIR.

Related Post – Buy Youtube Subscribers India Cheap {100% Real}

The petitioner will be released on temporary bail from the Dwarka court until the next hearing date, according to the apex court. The Dwarka Court has been ordered by the court to provide Khera with temporary respite.

Delhi | Dwarka court grants interim bail to Congress leader Pawan Khera in view of the order passed by the Supreme Court. The court granted him interim bail on furnishing a bond of Rs 30,000. He was arrested by Assam Police earlier today.

(File photo) pic.twitter.com/eIQItHrEsR
— ANI (@ANI) February 23, 2023

Ban on arrest till Tuesday

The arrest of Pawan Khera has been postponed by the Supreme Court until Tuesday. Three locations will have concurrent hearings for the cases filed against Khera. The court has also issued a warning to Pawan Khera for making offensive remarks.

Petition filed in Supreme Court regarding investigation of Hindenburg report; hearing will be held on Friday

The petition filed for the inquiry into the Hindenburg Research Report will be heard by the Supreme Court on Friday, according to an agreement.

The petition asked for a retired judge from the Supreme Court to oversee an investigation of the report. The court should instruct the central government to constitute a committee for this purpose, according to the petition.

The petition’s writer, attorney Vishal Tiwari, brought up the matter’s urgent listing before a bench presided over by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud on Thursday.

SC agrees to hear on Friday plea seeking court-monitored probe into Hindenburg Research report on Adani firms
— Press Trust of India (@PTI_News) February 9, 2023

He informed the bench that a second petition filed about the matter has a hearing date of February 10 scheduled. He requested that his plea and a different petition be heard by the bench on Friday. Justices J B Pardiwala and PS Narasimha were also on the bench.

Supreme Court upholds 10% EWS quota, Modi government’s big victory

The Supreme Court has affirmed the requirement of a 10% reservation for the general category’s economically weaker portions. Three of the five judges on the court have ruled in favor of the 2019 103rd Amendment to the Constitution. In the Supreme Court, it is considered one of the most significant victories for the Modi government.

Related Post – Buy 100% Real Instagram Followers & Likes in Dubai UAE

Actually, by changing the constitution, the federal government had provided a provision for a 10% reservation for the economically poorer portions of the general category. A case challenging the reservation provisions of the 103rd Constitutional Amendment was heard by the Supreme Court. Three judges in a five-judge panel—Justices Dinesh Maheshwari, Bela Trivedi, and JB Pardiwala—ruled in favor of the EWS reservation. Justice Ravindra Bhatt and Chief Justice UU Lalit have both expressed concern with the EWS reservation.

Five-judge Constitution bench of the Supreme Court upholds the validity of the Constitution's 103rd Amendment Act 2019, which provides for the 10 per cent EWS reservation amongst the general category.

Four judges uphold the Act while one judge passes a dissenting judgement. pic.twitter.com/nnd2yrXm0P
— ANI (@ANI) November 7, 2022

Support was given by three judges

The EWS reservation ruling was maintained by Justices Dinesh Maheshwari, Bela Trivedi, and JB Pardiwala. When expressing his opinion, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari noted that the key question was whether the EWS reservation violated the fundamental principles of the Constitution. Is it against the fundamental spirit to exclude SC, ST, and ObC? According to him, the Constitution is not violated by the EWS quota. The reservation for EWS is accurate. It doesn’t contravene any constitutional clauses. It doesn’t go against the Indian Constitution’s fundamental principles.

I concur with Justice Dinesh Maheshwari’s position, remarked Justice Bela Trivedi. The last line is not reserved, according to Justice Pardiwala. This is the first step toward achieving equality for everybody.

Justice Chandrachud to be 50th Chief Justice of India, CJI UU Lalit recommends successor

Chief Justice of India: Chief Justice of India UU Lalit has recommended Justice Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud as his replacement. Justice Chandrachud will be the 50th Chief Justice. On November 8, current Chief Justice UU Lalit will step down. On November 9, 2022, Justice Chandrachud will begin serving as the 50th Chief Justice of India for a two-year term. One of the CJI’s longest stretches in recent memory.

Related Post – Aishwarya Rai Latest Hot Beautiful Images

According to custom, the Chief Justice suggests the government hire the second-most senior judge. He is the second-highest-ranking judge behind Justice UU Lalit. In a meeting of all the Supreme Court justices on Tuesday at 10:15 a.m., CJI U. U. Lalit proposed Justice DY Chandrachud as his replacement. The Law Ministry will get a letter containing CJI Lalit’s recommendation.

Chief Justice of India UU Lalit recommends the name of Justice DY Chandrachud (in file pic) as his successor.

Justice Chandrachud to become the 50th CJI. Chief Justice UU Lalit is retiring on November 8 this year. pic.twitter.com/p0OymLfp0n
— ANI (@ANI) October 11, 2022

A look at the career of Justice Chandrachud

On May 13, 2016, Justice Chandrachud was chosen to serve as a member of the Supreme Court. He served as Chief Justice of the Allahabad High Court from October 31, 2013, to this date. On March 29, 2000, he was chosen to serve as a judge for the Bombay High Court. In 1998, he served as India’s Additional Solicitor General. He was appointed a Senior Advocate by the Bombay High Court in June 1998. Justice Chandrachud’s father, Justice YV Chandrachud, served as India’s 16th Chief Justice from 2 February 1978 until 11 July 1985.

Related Post – Buy Youtube Subscribers India Cheap {100% Real}

Demand for making laws to control population intensifies, Supreme Court issues notice to Central Government

The need for legislation to be passed to regulate the nation’s rapidly growing population is growing. In this regard, the Supreme Court has sent a notice to the Central Government today, i.e. on Friday.

The Central Government has been asked for a response in this regard, and a bench of Justices KM Joseph and Hrishikesh Roy has tagged the case with the pertinent outstanding petitions. Let us inform you that the Supreme Court has taken cognizance of a petition calling for a law on population control that was submitted to the court.

According to the petition submitted by Dandi Swami Jitendranand, General Secretary of Akhil Bharatiya Sant Samiti, the population of the nation is growing daily, yet our resources are limited and we cannot support the load of an ever-increasing population. The government must take into account the effects of growing unemployment, poverty, health problems, and a hampered food supply on the nation.

The central government has been urged in the petition to establish the necessary regulations and lay out guidelines for the imposition of a population tax in order to safeguard the fundamental rights of the millions of citizens whose lives have been adversely affected by the nation’s overpopulation issue.

Prophet Remark: Supreme Court reprimands Nupur Sharma, asks her to apologize on TV for her remarks on Prophet

Prophet Remark Row: Former BJP spokesperson and leader Nupur Sharma has been reprimanded by the Supreme Court. Nupur Sharma should apologize to the whole country on TV, the court said. The whole country is on fire due to one of his statements. Along with this, Nupur Sharma and the TV channel should not promote any agenda related to any such matter which is sub judice in the court.

Nupur Sharma, suspended from the BJP, had applied in the Supreme Court to shift all the FIRs registered against her in different states of the country to Delhi in the Prophet controversy. During the hearing of her petition, the top court held Nupur Sharma’s statements as ‘responsible’ for the unfortunate incident in Udaipur.

Despite Sharma’s plea, the court turned down his application and recommended that he approach the High Court. After this Nupur Sharma withdrew her application from the Supreme Court.

Nupur Sharma had made controversial remarks on Prophet Muhammad during a TV debate last month, against which about a dozen FIRs were lodged against him in many states of the country.

What is the whole matter

During a debate on television, former BJP spokesperson Nupur Sharma and minister Naveen Jindal made offensive comments about Prophet Mohammad. The heat of this matter reached Islamic countries and more than 12 countries had objected to Nupur Sharma’s statement. Qatar had also asked India to apologize for this statement.

After the Supreme Court’s relief, Eknath Shinde said “the victory of the real Shiv Sena”! not a rebellion, but a fight for the self-respect of the army

Maharashtra Political Crisis: Eknath Shinde called it a ‘real’ Shiv Sena victory after the Supreme Court granted relief to Shiv Sena rebel MLAs. “This is a win for Dharamveer Anand Dighe Sahab’s ideals and Badshah Balasaheb Thackeray’s Hindutva,” wrote Shinde in Marathi. He included the hashtag “#realshivsenawins” in his post.

हा वंदनीय हिंदुहृदयसम्राट शिवसेनाप्रमुख बाळासाहेब ठाकरे यांच्या हिंदुत्वाचा आणि धर्मवीर आनंद दिघे साहेबांच्या विचारांचा विजय..!#realshivsenawins
— Eknath Shinde – एकनाथ शिंदे (@mieknathshinde) June 27, 2022

Notably, the Supreme Court permitted the Shiv Sena dissident MLAs to reply to the Maharashtra Assembly’s Deputy Speaker’s notice of disqualification by 5.30 PM on July 12. On July 11, a hearing has been scheduled regarding the issue.

Justices Surya Kant and JB Pardiwala’s bench declared that the deadline set by the Deputy Speaker for the petitioners or other MLAs to submit their submissions by today at 5:30 pm was extended to July 12 as a temporary remedy. The writ petition’s petitioners or other legislators are able to include a response without jeopardising their rights.

Ajay Choudhary, Deputy Speaker, and Centre Assembly Secretary received notice from the highest court and was instructed to respond in writing within five days.

‘Not a rebellion, but a fight for the self-respect of the army’

A representative for the Shinde camp and Shiv Sena MLA Deepak Kesarkar stated that their goal is to safeguard Hindutva following the Supreme Court’s relief. He asserted that the Eknath Shinde camp’s relocation is not a rebellion but rather a struggle for the Shiv Sena’s self-respect.

He declared, “Our struggle is for Hindu Hriday Samrat Shiv Sena Chief Balasaheb’s ideals, the existence of Shiv Sena, the pride of Marathi, and Hindutva.

He stated “I implore Uddhav Ji Thackeray, the leader of my party, to consider, see, and create a new alliance with the BJP. This BJP and Shiv Sena coalition are in accordance with the Maharashtrian people’s choice. Maharashtra will reach new levels of development thanks to this coalition (UT).”

Jahangirpuri violence: Forensic team reached the area, started collecting evidence, 23 people arrested

Jahangirpuri violence in Delhi has drawn the attention of the forensic team. The team has also started an investigation to gather evidence and trace the sequence of events.

At a Hanuman Jayanti procession in Jahangirpur on Saturday evening, violence broke out. Police have so far taken 23 people into custody. In parallel, the police intend to present the main accused Ansar and Aslam in Rohini court today after a day’s remand. The court has already sent 12 defendants to jail.

The matter reached the Supreme Court

Jahangirpuri violence has now reached the Supreme Court. It has been filed before CJI NV Ramana a letter petition seeking a court-monitored investigation by taking suo motu cognizance of the Jahangirpuri violence. There has been a request to the Supreme Court to constitute a committee under the chairmanship of a judge of the Supreme Court to investigate the Jahangirpuri riots impartially.

Attorney Amritpal Singh Khalsa has filed a letter petition regarding the Jahangirpuri violence case. On the other hand, another petition was filed in the Supreme Court regarding the violence in seven states, including Delhi, on Ram Navami and Hanuman Jayanti, calling for an investigation by the NIA.

Jahangirpuri Riot Updates:

The investigation of the riots has definitely been handed over to the crime branch, however, the local police continue raiding the area to catch the rioters.

As well as the two big-name figures Ansar and Aslam, 21 arrests and two minors have been made so far in the rioting.

An investigation revealed that a criminal Gulli of the area had prompted Aslam to fire, and efforts are being made to catch him.

Additionally, another person was seen firing, but his bullet didn’t hit anyone, but he has been identified and raids are underway to find him. Salim aka Chikna, who was personally involved in the riots and is also its distant brother, has also been caught.

Related Post – Best Hyderabad Bridal Makeup Artists

The forensic team is gathering support today. Crime branch officers will visit the scene soon, and a number may be issued, through which a public appeal will be made to send photos and videos so that the perpetrators of violence can be identified with the help of a cyber cell.