The Allahabad High Court has scheduled the next hearing in the Gyanvapi case for February 12th. The Varanasi court’s order permitting Hindu devotees to say prayers in the Gyanvapi mosque‘s cellar was being challenged in an appeal filed by the Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee, which was being heard by the High Court.
Tag: Allahabad High Court
SC bans survey in Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah Mosque dispute, hearing on mosque side’s petition to be held
Supreme Court bans survey of Shahi Idgah in Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, where Shri Krishna was born. The Allahabad High Court‘s directive to designate a commissioner (Court Commissioner) to examine the mosque has been suspended by the court.
The court has declared that the matter should continue to be heard, nevertheless. The Allahabad High Court’s December 14 order was stayed by a bench made up of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Dutta while they were considering a special leave petition submitted by the Shahi Idgah Mosque Committee.
The Supreme Court has ruled that the Allahabad High Court may consider this petition; nevertheless, the order appointing the commissioner from December 14, 2023, and the survey are being halted immediately. The Supreme Court has set January 23, 2024, as the date of the next hearing in this matter. Seven people, including attorney Vishnu Shankar Jain and Hindu leader Shri Krishna Virajman, submitted this petition.
Big blow to Muslim side in Gyanvapi case, High Court rejects five petitions
Gyanvapi Case: An important ruling on the ownership dispute of the Gyanvapi Mosque has been rendered by the Allahabad High Court. This is good news for those who support the temple. The trial in the 1991 case has been permitted by the Allahabad High Court. The High Court of Allahabad has dismissed five petitions.
The Sunni Central Waqf Board and Anjuman Intejamia Masjid Committee filed petitions contesting the ownership dispute cases, however, their requests were denied by Judge Justice Rohit Ranjan Aggarwal’s bench.
According to the court, the case has an impact on two significant national populations. The Varanasi District Trial Court has been directed by the High Court to decide on the matter within six months.
Big decision of SC in Mathura Janmabhoomi case, there will be no ban on survey of Idgah Mosque
Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi Dispute: The Supreme Court issued an important decision in the Mathura Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi dispute case. The Allahabad High Court’s ruling has not been stayed by the court.
Let us inform you that the survey of the Idgah Mosque next to the Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi shrine was permitted by the Allahabad High Court yesterday, December 14. A Supreme Court petition was submitted in opposition to the ruling of the High Court. The court’s ruling has stunned the Muslim community.
Vishnu Shankar Jain, a lawyer for the Hindu side, states: “The Supreme Court declined to halt the proceedings, and about the challenge to the transfer order, the Supreme Court has scheduled the case for January 9…the High Court There will be no stay by the Supreme Court, and the order will remain in effect while the High Court handles the case.”
According to Swami Jitendranand Saraswati, General Secretary of All India Sant Samiti, the truth about Shri Krishna’s birthplace will be revealed in the same way that the truth about Gyanvapi has. In the struggle for the liberation of Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi, this decision is momentous. The court commission’s verdict has been warmly received by the saints.
ASI survey will continue in Varanasi’s Gyanvapi mosque, High Court rejects Muslim side’s petition
On Thursday, the Allahabad High Court decided on the ASI survey of Varanasi’s Gyanvapi Mosque. The court rejected the appeal of the Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee and approved the ASI survey of the Gyanvapi Masjid.
The Varanasi District Judge had mandated an ASI survey of Gyanvapi on July 21. First at the Supreme Court, then in the High Court, the Muslim side contested the ASI survey’s findings. A petition by the Muslim side to ban the survey has been rejected by the High Court. Allahabad High Court said the ASI survey is necessary in the interest of justice. It needs to be implemented under certain conditions.
Agra: What is the petition regarding the Taj Mahal, the secret of 22 rooms, know the full details of the dispute
The Taj Mahal of Agra is also being discussed in connection with the Gyanvapi Masjid-Kashi Vishwanath Temple dispute of Varanasi. An application was filed in the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court regarding the Taj Mahal, which urged the opening of 22 rooms of the Taj Mahal so that it may be determined if there were any idols and inscriptions of gods and goddesses inside?
Related Post – How To Improve Ecommerce Conversion Rates – 8 Tips to Quickly Increase Conversion Sales
This ancient monument, built in a unique style of Persian, Indian, and Islamic architecture, is said to be a testament to love. It was built in memory of Mughal emperor Shah Jahan’s wife Mumtaz along the banks of the Yamuna. Despite the Taj Mahal‘s beauty, there have been so many disputes surrounding it.
In 1666, Shah Jahan died, but the controversy continued. There were rumors that the Taj Mahal was actually Tejo Mahalaya and was the focal point of the Hindu religion. One such voice has arisen again. A petition has been filed by Rajneesh Singh, media in-charge of BJP in Ayodhya at the Lucknow Bench of Allahabad High Court.
Mansingh’s Palace Logic
The petitioner has asked that the Archaeological Survey of India be allowed to open 22 rooms inside the Taj Mahal to discover whether Hindu sculptures and inscriptions are hidden within. Rajneesh Singh’s lawyer Rudra Vikram Singh says that all travelers who came in 1600 AD mention Mansingh’s palace in their travel descriptions.
It was said that the Taj Mahal was built in 1653 and that Aurangzeb wrote in 1651 that Ammi’s tomb needed to be repaired, on the basis of all such facts now needs to be clarified: what’s inside the 22 closed rooms of the Taj Mahal?
Demand has been made from the High Court that the government should form an ASI and historians fact-finding committee to submit a report on this matter. As soon as this petition was filed, politics erupted. According to Congress, the BJP deliberately diverts attention from important concerns.
It has come to our attention that a few days ago, the Peethadheeshwar Acharya Paramhans of the Ascetic Camp in Ayodhya was also banned from entering the town. The controversy had already deepened when activists of some Hindu parties read Hanuman Chalisa inside the Taj Mahal.
Where did the controversy begin
The controversy over the Taj Mahal began with the publication of the book ‘True Story of Taj’ by historian PN Oak. A lot of claims were made in this book regarding the Taj Mahal being a Shiva temple. A few historians claim the Taj Mahal has 22 rooms under the main mausoleum and the jasmine floors that have been closed.
Related Post – Top Instagram Fashion Bloggers in Assam, Guwahati, North East
It is believed that there are stairs up and down the jasmine floor to lead into the basement towards the Yamuna’s edge. An iron net has been placed over these to close them. Until about 45 years ago, access to the stairs was open. This petition has been filed to open the 22 rooms.